Get the Str8ts App
Welcome to the home of Str8ts

#793, August 31 - September 6:
The Weekly Extreme Str8ts Puzzle

by Andrew Stuart

WARNING: This is the Weekly 'Extreme' Str8ts.
Only attempt this puzzle if you have time and patience.
Using the solver will not help you. (much).

Oct 18th 2024
The solver can now handle Str8ts variants. Yay! The solver button on the player will now pass an appropriate parameter.
Archive
Since there has been interesting strategy discussion on these puzzles and by popular request, I have opened an archive on the last thirty weeks. The discussion section is open for continued posting.
All Access Supporters can load all puzzles from number 1.
Share and Enjoy
Puzzles 1 to 250 are available as Puzzle Packs, just $5.49.

Discussion...
Posts you have NOT read are in normal colors, older ones are in grey.
Please email me if you experience problems or bugs. Cheers, Andrew Stuart


Your Name or Handle

Your comment or question

Enter these letters arrow

Please keep your comments relevant to this page.
To state your solve time use the smaller form at the top right of this page.
Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted. No need to use <p> or <br> tags.
No full solutions please!

by: hepa

Like
1
Like
5
 

by: OneGuess

Like
1
Like
 difficult but nice as always - thanks hepa!
 

by: Auwei

Like
1
Like
Again a very nice puzzle, not too difficult. cand 6,7 and many setties were the clues. Thanks to hepa!
Add to this thread

by: acs

Like
2
Like
9
 The Weekly Str8ts X puzzle #185
 

by: optimator

Like
1
Like
 8' easier than most X
 

by: Martinus

Like
Like
 UR made it fast. Thanks!
 

by: tg

Like
Like
 Easy as soon as you discover the 2-fish in 7/8/9.
 

by: tg

Like
Like
 Sorry, the comment above was meant for the puzzle #793, not for the x-puzzle.
 

by: ThomasF

Like
Like
 nice, standard tools only
 

by: Cosmanita

Like
Like
 I also used an UR like Martinus to delete one option from C9.
 

by: jgrab

Like
Like
Nice and solvable.
Add to this thread

by: acs

Like
1
Like
2
 The Weekly Str8ts B puzzle #185
 

by: optimator

Like
Like
 I needed a chain on e4 at the end
 

by: Hel

Like
Like
 33' WC (no chain needed)
 

by: Martinus

Like
Like
Interesting key for me: Small chain/UR combination. Thanks.
Add to this thread

by: acs

Like
5
Like
6
 The Weekly Str8ts puzzle #793
 

by: hp

Like
1
Like
 hard nut for me,
after Setti 5, xwing 3 and 3fish 3, Setti 3 and 3fish 2 see no progress
chain shows me, that 5 must be in J3
maybe missed a fish??
 

by: MrL

Like
Like
 @hp @tg (half page above). There is a powerful x-wing 4 in EF89, but first you must know that there is no 7 in rowF.
 

by: pax

Like
2
Like
 As far as I remember setti on 8 clarified, where the 8 must be in D1-3. Short HC excluded D3.
 

by: hhclimb

Like
Like
 @hp: start as you mentioned, but I see no 3fish2. Instead: CE in Row E (=E9 without 5), then setti 3 (clears Col 4). Assumption "no 8 in Col 4" leads to immediate contradiction, setti 8 does the rest
 

by: hp

Like
Like
 It all sounds a bit chainy to me,
8 has to be in Col 4 anyway?!
Some people write that Setti and fish are sufficient, I'd be interested to know more about that.
 

by: MrL

Like
1
Like
 @hp @hhclimb. Assumption "no 8 in Col 4" should be "no 8 in Col 3". Short HC clears all candidates in A4 => contradiction, rest is easy. Nice!
 

by: hhclimb

Like
Like
 @MrL: you are right, sorry for my typing error
 

by: hp

Like
Like
 Agreed, but a (head) chain is neither a Fish nor a Setti
 

by: David

Like
Like
 @hp: I'm also not satisfied with the current solution, maybe we can work together to find a chain-free one?

After your steps, I found a UR in GHJ3: if it's 234, you could exchange G123 and J123, so GHJ3 is either 123 or 345. This excludes 4 from J3. It's not much, but it's honest work.

At this point there a several short HCs excluding 1 from J3. The best one for me so far is:
For the case of GHJ3=123 there is an X-Wing on 2 that results in J4=6, excluding 1 from J3. However, I'm not sure if this can be seen as chain-free.

After eliminating 1 in J3, due to my first argument, G3 can not be 2. This solves 4 more cells.

My gutfeeling tells me, that a combined Setti on 2 and 7 could become important at some point, but currently, not everything is set for it, maybe you see something here?

@all The contradiction to the assumption "no 8 in col 4" is rather long. I prefer excluding 4 from B3 by the same argument that all candidates in A3 would be eliminated. After this, Setti 8 can be performed as pointed out by hhclimb.

These are my 2 cents as for today. This one is challenging, I like it and will certainly come back later this week :)
 

by: hhclimb

Like
Like
 assumption "no 8 in col 3" leads to a cintradiction in exactly 3 steps (in HC or solver). I would not regard this as "too long" for a chain.
When should a chain be regarded as "too long" and when as a "guess"?
 

by: aw

Like
Like
 Trial and error: The wrong choice in A7 leads to a 6-cell-UR (34) in the upper right (or, later, missing digits in the lower left), the right choice finishes easily.
 

by: hoke

Like
Like
 3 steps of a hhclimb hc: 4 must be in col 3, so a3 is 5, d1 is 8, so a5 is 5.
 

by: hoke

Like
Like
 typo: d1 is 8, so a1 is 5. But still it is neither a fish nor a Setti ;-)
 

by: David

Like
Like
@hhclimb and hoke: to me it seems that the first step after the assumption 'no 8 in col 3' is setting B3=4. Starting from this, one can proof in different ways that this leads to a contradiction (either showing that there is A1=A5=5 or that no option is left in A4, sorry for the typo in my previous comment).

However, one can also just directly proof that B3!=4 with the no-options-in-A4-chain or showing that if A3=5 a short HC (A7=4,A4=3) leads to B4=4. If 4 is excluded from B3, 8 must be in col 3 and one can proceed with the Setti 8.
Long story short: Directly showing B3!=4, leads to the same result as the assumption 'no 8 in col 3' but there is one step less in the argumentation chain. This is why I find this way a bit more elegant.

Regarding the question 'When is a chain too long': I think everyone has to answer this for him/herself. Personally, I would love to find a solution without even a small chain based on (combined) Settis, fishes, URs and wild combinations of these. If someone is interested to do so as well, I'm open for discussions on how one could proceed. I tried a few things today but couldn't progress.
Add to this thread

by: acs

Like
3
Like
10
 The Weekly Str8ts BX puzzle #185
 

by: WolfgangL

Like
Like
 Develops very nicely, standard tool only, thanks!
 

by: Aubinger

Like
Like
 50' wc
 

by: optimator

Like
1
Like
 5', didn't need X
 

by: Martinus

Like
Like
 Like WolfgangL, thanks!
 

by: Hel

Like
Like
 22' WC
 

by: kmr

Like
Like
 Like WolfgangL and Martinus. Nice puzzle, developing smoothly. Thanks!
 

by: ThomasF

Like
Like
 like WolfgangL
 

by: pax

Like
Like
 25' WC
 

by: jgrab

Like
Like
19' done.
Add to this thread
Page created on 27-June-2010.
All puzzles not marked 'guest compiler' on this site are trademarked and cannot be reproduced without permission.
Copyright Jeff Widderich and Andrew Stuart @ Syndicated Puzzles, Privacy, 2007-2024
Caution!
Boast or Rant!

Tell everyone if you solved this puzzle, how long it took or if you gave up.
Name or handle:

Comment, including time to solve (or not :)


For questions or discussion, please use the main comment form.
  • 33';
    - jim
  • 37" not to bad
    - Maven
  • a couple hours. Lots of chains.
    - puzzled
  • 15min mit Tipp von S. Walt, danke!
    - humpti dumpti
  • 43 min - alle Hinweise gebraucht
    - Rot
  • 20 min
    - relijo
  • Very enjoyable.
    - Essie
  • 1h, Test D3=8 führt schnell zu Widerspruch. Settis. Danke für das interessante Rätsel.
    - S. Walt
  • 30 mins with J3 clue.
    - EddyBear
  • Pax' little move on 8 did it.
    - jgrab
  • 17' I used one short interaction as described by pax
    - Cosmanita
  • done with h/l-decision in J
    - chris1
  • 72' - did not see a way w/o small HC. Thanks!
    - triemers
  • Hi/Lo decision in H4/J4, settis, x-wings. Then careful elimination.
    - Solver_3
  • 20min - pure luck with a good guess on the HL in col 1
    - Latimer
  • 60 min - Settis und x-wings
    - wjanet
  • 44min, 1 lucky guess.
    - 7iron
  • 25' wings and settis
    - optimator
  • 33 min - a lot of wings and 2 settis; very nice level for me
    - Michael
  • 26'30 min - very nice indeed
    - Beate
  • Not easy but done.
    - MrL
  • 28' Settis and X-wing
    - Emma
  • 2 h with BCA and x-wings.
    - E.H.
  • 55 min. Had to use a chain to decide, where the 2 goes in row 3 or 4. Settis, wings. Nice.
    - juehe
  • 27 min. Very nice, just as i like it. Settis and wings, no chains
    - charliepat
  • 30 min
    - Loser
  • not too easy, but nice, wings, settis, fish. But I needed a short HC in Col3 (test a high number).
    - hhclimb
  • 40'. After some settis, a wing and a fish, a short HC to exclude sth. would solve it immediately.
    - MartinL
  • 46‘
    - Greg
  • 26' WC, one small HC
    - pax
  • 57 min - started with logic G6/H6, then finding 2 in last column
    - Susi
  • 32' nice, some wing, fish and setti
    - ThomasF
  • 29’ in 2nd attempt after wrong choice for missing 8 in 1st attempt
    - marwis
  • 50 minuten,reihe 1 und 6 waren irgendwann logisch.
    - dersoloist
  • 0:24:39 nach 3. Anlauf nicht schwer
    - zoo-pony (Tartlau)
  • Chainless, after analyzin column 1 and 3, settis
    - Alois
  • 39' with one lucky guess. Good morning!
    - A B Traherne
  • Used a chain to determine if the 2 is in 3 or 4.
    - Greg